Your Star
Send your messages to 80360, start your message with Star News or click here to contact us »
Want to share your opinion, leave a tribute or comment on a news story? It's easy!
You can register for free here and comment on any of our stories.
Your news, Your views.
Schools told to improve or face closure
1:00pm Tuesday 10th June 2008
Comments (19)TWO struggling St Helens secondary schools are among hundreds nationally that could face closure if they do not improve.
Newton High and Sutton High Sports College were named on a list of 638 secondary schools across the country targeted because more than 70 per cent of pupils are not achieving five good GCSEs.
If the schools do not improve they could either be closed or replaced by privately-backed academies under a £400 million drive to raise standards of education, it has been announced.
Newton High is already earmarked for closure as part of a merger with St Aelred's Catholic Technology which would create a £33m academy.
A decision on whether the academy will go ahead will be taken by Children's Secretary Ed Balls.
Sutton High Sports College has been told it must improve because only 29 per cent of pupils are getting five GCSEs grade A to C.
Education chiefs in St Helens will be given a 50-day deadline to come up with a rescue plan for the school that is on the Government's hit list.
Mr Balls, meanwhile, is doubling the cash available for the 638 secondary schools in England where more than 70per cent of teenagers fail to get five C grades in their GCSEs.
The "National Challenge" initiative will see an expansion of the controversial academies programme, with up to 313 of the privately-sponsored schools set to be open by 2010.
A St Helens Council spokesperson said: "The Local Education Authority has not been informed that any of its schools are on this list.
"However, even before this announcement was made the LEA had already put in place actions to address issues at both schools.
"A recent Ofsted inspection at Newton High School recorded that it had made significant improvements and, in line with the Government's Academy programme, there are already plans to create a Newton Academy.
"Sutton High only just falls within the Government's target at 29% and a plan is already in place to raise GCSE attainment at the school. We are optimistic that there will be improvements this summer.
"Overall attaining is improving and last year we were above the national average."
Your Say YourSt Helens Star
Bill Bradbury, says...
2:30pm Tue 10 Jun 08
Schools are not all about GCSE grades but the type of person they can turn out into society and hold down a job and run a decent family, far more than the current media care to admit. Dysfunctional families and kids are the flavour of the month.
As one who has been closely involved in Education for over 40 years and a Governor of two schools, I think I know what I am talking about.
I would suggest parents make a note of this year's exam grades at the so called failing schools, (what an insult to the present staff and pupils) and I will promise I will compare them with the results of the new Academies. Note what St.Aelred's figure's are this year and compare them with the new Academy. If the glossy brochures are to go on, the results will show a marked improvement for an Academy=sucess, so the spin tells us. The "name" makes all the difference!!! Same old staff, same old pupils but probably with some high flyer head who has the answer to all Education's ills. That is why the failure/resignation rate of such heads is the highest in the education sector.
Don't take my word for it, just read up on Academies, which you may find in the Library. "The Great City Academy Fraud" by Francis Beckett and "Education plc. Understanding private sector participation in the public sector education" Stephen J. Ball.
Then come and tell me how an academy will make a difference.
Bill Bradbury, says...
2:30pm Tue 10 Jun 08
Schools are not all about GCSE grades but the type of person they can turn out into society and hold down a job and run a decent family, far more than the current media care to admit. Dysfunctional families and kids are the flavour of the month.
As one who has been closely involved in Education for over 40 years and a Governor of two schools, I think I know what I am talking about.
I would suggest parents make a note of this year's exam grades at the so called failing schools, (what an insult to the present staff and pupils) and I will promise I will compare them with the results of the new Academies. Note what St.Aelred's figure's are this year and compare them with the new Academy. If the glossy brochures are to go on, the results will show a marked improvement for an Academy=sucess, so the spin tells us. The "name" makes all the difference!!! Same old staff, same old pupils but probably with some high flyer head who has the answer to all Education's ills. That is why the failure/resignation rate of such heads is the highest in the education sector.
Don't take my word for it, just read up on Academies, which you may find in the Library. "The Great City Academy Fraud" by Francis Beckett and "Education plc. Understanding private sector participation in the public sector education" Stephen J. Ball.
Then come and tell me how an academy will make a difference.
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:56pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:56pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:56pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:57pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:57pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
Bill Bradbury, says...
4:57pm Tue 10 Jun 08
One wonders why this policy is being pursued at public expense? (Building Schools for the Future comes from a Government "pot".)
heather, st. helens says...
8:35pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st. helens says...
8:35pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st.helens says...
9:10pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st.helens says...
9:10pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st. helens says...
9:20pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st. helens says...
9:20pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st helens says...
9:32pm Fri 13 Jun 08
heather, st helens says...
9:32pm Fri 13 Jun 08
Heather, St. helens says...
9:57pm Fri 13 Jun 08
Heather, St. helens says...
9:57pm Fri 13 Jun 08
In this section
- Finance boost for Saints ahead of new stadium
- Payback time for criminals
- Man suffers suspected broken ankle putting out fire
- Helping to save our planet
- St Helens Council unites to fight threat to Whiston Hospital’s burns unit
- Pilks Recs face uncertain future after thieves strike
- Police issue e-fit of distraction burglary suspect
- Investigation launched into house fire
- Pat wins vote for top college role
- Referee Steve Ganson to appeal against arrest
Sponsored Links
Local advertisers
Local Information
Enter your postcode, town or place name
Bill Bradbury, says...
2:30pm Tue 10 Jun 08
Schools are not all about GCSE grades but the type of person they can turn out into society and hold down a job and run a decent family, far more than the current media care to admit. Dysfunctional families and kids are the flavour of the month.
As one who has been closely involved in Education for over 40 years and a Governor of two schools, I think I know what I am talking about.
I would suggest parents make a note of this year's exam grades at the so called failing schools, (what an insult to the present staff and pupils) and I will promise I will compare them with the results of the new Academies. Note what St.Aelred's figure's are this year and compare them with the new Academy. If the glossy brochures are to go on, the results will show a marked improvement for an Academy=sucess, so the spin tells us. The "name" makes all the difference!!! Same old staff, same old pupils but probably with some high flyer head who has the answer to all Education's ills. That is why the failure/resignation rate of such heads is the highest in the education sector.
Don't take my word for it, just read up on Academies, which you may find in the Library. "The Great City Academy Fraud" by Francis Beckett and "Education plc. Understanding private sector participation in the public sector education" Stephen J. Ball.
Then come and tell me how an academy will make a difference.