Ex-council leader shoved Labour candidate as town hall tensions flared

Brian Spencer during the election count. Brian Spencer during the election count.

A FORMER Liberal Democrat leader of St Helens Council has finally given up on his denials and admitted assaulting a Labour party candidate during an election night bust up.

Brian Spencer, 65, confessed on Monday that he shoved Labour candidate Mark Johnson in St Helens Town Hall’s assembly room as results were returned last May.

It sparked a flashpoint that resulted in Spencer – who police noted smelled of alcohol - being escorted out of the counting room by officers.

The former pit electrician had been due to stand trial at South Sefton Magistrates’ Court but instead pleaded guilty, which resulted in a conviction for assault and a fine totalling £395.

Moments before he was due to appear before magistrates, prosecutor Alison Clarkson appeared to dismiss a suggestion from Spencer’s solicitor Neal Boland that his client sit on the front bench instead of in the dock.

She said: “Why are we treating him differently from anyone else?”

The court went on to hear that as a disastrous set of results for his party was unfolding, Spencer was angered by alleged Labour remarks aimed at his long-serving Lib Dem deputy leader Suzanne Knight, moments after she had been defeated.

Mr Boland argued the incident showed the “nasty world” of local politics and alleged it came after Spencer had heard an unnamed Labour member say: “it’s time we got rid of that bitch”.

Miss Clarkson said the defendant admitted shoving Mr Johnson, who stumbled backwards and fell onto his mother Janet, a serving councillor: “It has been accepted that as a result of the defendant’s actions, it caused a domino effect. He fell onto his mother and she fell.”

She explained counting was still taking place after midnight on May 4 and it had been announced that Cllr Knight had lost her seat.

She added: “They were leaving the count, clearly upset about what was happening. There was a verbal altercation between the defendant and another councillor.

"At that stage, the defendant was walking out of the count and had to walk past Mr Johnson and his father (Tony), who were watching the count.

“He went to Mr Johnson senior directly and shoulder barged him. It didn’t cause injury but some upset and there was some comment.

“The defendant then walked to Mark Johnson and pushed him using both hands, causing him to fall backwards, twisting his ankle. His mother was uninjured.

“Police officers were present and saw it happen. They go over and he is escorted out of the premises.

“One of the sergeants said he can smell intoxicants on his breath, but he wasn’t drunk. In interview he accepted he had a brandy.”

The incident was a result of “disgraceful” tactics employed by Labour on the night, claimed Spencer’s solicitor Neal Boland.

He said: “Had this trial proceeded, you would have heard evidence about the nasty world of politics. It was the most tense election night that he came across in more than 30-years. That sets the scene for what happened.

“When the result of Suzanne Knight’s seat was indicated there was a great deal of enthusiasm from Labour. There were inflammatory remarks and one person said: ‘it’s about time we got rid of that bitch and now she’s gone’.

“There was an exchange and he said ‘there was no need for that. She’s been a faithful councillor for a number of years and you should show some respect’.

“Suzanne Knight wanted to shake hands with the successful candidate and Returning Officer then find a way out of the room. She was ahead of Brian Spencer, but Mr Johnson senior stood across his path and was smirking.

“It was suggested that he (Spencer) was aggrieved because he lost his seat. But that wasn’t the case. His result was not in for another 15 minutes.

“He accepts he barged into Anthony Johnson and in response Mark Johnson stepped forward. The defence say that he did that in a confrontational way.

“He accepts that he pushed Mark Johnson and that he stumbled slightly.”

Mr Boland said had Spencer made a full admission in police interview, there would be no case before court: “It’s a very sad and sorry situation that he finds himself before court; having spent almost all his adult life volunteering for the benefit of the local community and local politics. But be that as it may, we can’t turn back the clock.”

Comments(14)

anthonywilson says...
10:36pm Wed 31 Oct 12

The productive bear pit of town hall politics in St Helens. It really sets a shining example to the rest of the country and local residents doesn't it. In future set a more positive example Councillors (and former Councillors) of all parties, act more professionally and without the infantile behaviour.
I'm sure businesses will be rolling up to invest in St Helens with this great example of political leadership ....Not.

Davos99 says...
2:27pm Thu 1 Nov 12

"having spent almost all his adult life volunteering for the benefit of the local community and local politics"

NO- he was PAID . If you want to see people volunteering for the benefit of their community go to Willowbrook Hospice or any charty shop. And I'm sure Spencer knew he'd lost his seat well before the result was announced , it wouldn't take a mathmetician once counting was underway.

As far as I'm concerned the whole incident demonstrates why St Helens lags behind many other towns in the north west in terms of investment and innovation.We have a town hall stuffed with party political yes men and women, who only have loyalty to their particular party.

Sankey says...
3:21pm Thu 1 Nov 12

There were inflammatory remarks and one person said: ‘it’s about time we got rid of that **** and now she’s gone’.

Very nice! who an earth are these people? If this is an example of the mindset of our local councillors we would be better off without them.

keepitreel says...
4:40pm Thu 1 Nov 12

should the person who said"get rid of the ****!" be named as i assume they were an elected representative of this town,and it shows thw labour party for what they are , agang of bully boys who think they own this town NOT represent it.

pitbullboxing says...
6:05pm Thu 1 Nov 12

He got pushed? What a fag. Christ I've been beaten up by 6 guys and once and just brushed it off. Go and get a lessen in manning up you ****.

pitbullboxing says...
6:05pm Thu 1 Nov 12

*lesson*

Sankey says...
6:34pm Thu 1 Nov 12

keepitreel wrote:
should the person who said"get rid of the ****!" be named as i assume they were an elected representative of this town,and it shows thw labour party for what they are , agang of bully boys who think they own this town NOT represent it.
Fair point if this is a councillor St Helens council have a formal code of conduct freely avalible to download by the public. Treat people with respect is one of the guidleines. Which if this person was a councillor they would be in breach of. Given the trouble and not considerable expense this person caused maybe more should be known over this aspect of this incident.

smith&weston says...
7:30am Fri 2 Nov 12

The victim in all this doesn't come out with much credit in my view. They where shoved, not beaten to a pulp in a sustained attack. Why not simply say grow up and walk away ? Nope, they went straight to the police in an effort to make as big a deal as possible over this trivial non event. I don't want people like that running my local council either.

anthonywilson says...
6:10pm Fri 2 Nov 12

I wonder why the Star's article did not mention by name who in the context of the article was the councillor who Brian Spencer was having a verbal altercation with (and I quote from above:.....)

“They were leaving the count, clearly upset about what was happening. There was a verbal altercation between the defendant (sic Brian Spencer) and another councillor."

For the record, The St Helens Reporter has actually printed that this other Councillor was in fact
Cllr De Asha.

Kevfob says...
9:04pm Fri 2 Nov 12

I'm sure it's all they are talking about at the Mayors dinner at the town hall tonight.

Davos99 says...
10:35am Mon 5 Nov 12

anthonywilson wrote:
I wonder why the Star's article did not mention by name who in the context of the article was the councillor who Brian Spencer was having a verbal altercation with (and I quote from above:.....) “They were leaving the count, clearly upset about what was happening. There was a verbal altercation between the defendant (sic Brian Spencer) and another councillor." For the record, The St Helens Reporter has actually printed that this other Councillor was in fact Cllr De Asha.
The original story in another paper qouted Cllr Knight as saying the comment that kicked Spencer off was " That is the sweetest victory" .I'm not sure why everyone is rushing to believe Spencer's account when he made repeat denials he had assualted anyone.

Davos99 says...
10:38am Mon 5 Nov 12

Sankey wrote:
keepitreel wrote: should the person who said"get rid of the ****!" be named as i assume they were an elected representative of this town,and it shows thw labour party for what they are , agang of bully boys who think they own this town NOT represent it.
Fair point if this is a councillor St Helens council have a formal code of conduct freely avalible to download by the public. Treat people with respect is one of the guidleines. Which if this person was a councillor they would be in breach of. Given the trouble and not considerable expense this person caused maybe more should be known over this aspect of this incident.
The comment aimed at Cllr Knight has already been published in another paper immediately after the incident.For some reason between that date and the court date that statement appears to have changed , people should draw their own conclusions.

Davos99 says...
10:50am Mon 5 Nov 12

Apologies, the story at the time featured in The Star , and I quote:

"Asked the nature of the comments, he confirmed it surrounded alleged remarks by Labour that victory in the Newton ward held by Cllr Knight was “the sweetest of the night” and that the council “would have to start looking for a new mayor”.

keepitreel says...
1:29pm Tue 6 Nov 12

davos 99,so if this had been reported why was the **** reference not published?and can we assume the person who said it will be brought to book by the council leader? or can we have the names out in the public so we can see who we are voting for and were was the council leader when all this was happening?

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree